News

The Guardian view on universities: a bailout is in all our interests

There is no reason why Britain’s universities should suffer permanent damage as a result of coronavirus. But, like many other institutions, they will need support in order to avoid it. The immediate issue is the present. The deaths from Covid-19 of people such as Ade Raymond, who was studying for a nursing degree at Middlesex university, will leave big gaps.

On top of such personal losses comes the virus’s wider impact. While lectures and teaching continue online, the removal of access to libraries and laboratories, and, above all, to people, takes a toll – particularly on students in their final year, or on one-year courses. Following February’s strikes, some will feel they have lost half a year of their higher education. Those reliant on income from casual work (often in retail or catering), or tied into rental agreements for shared houses, risk increased debts and other hardships.

Coronavirus: the week explained - sign up for our email newsletter

Read more
Academics are struggling, like other workers, with the challenge of combining day jobs with caring responsibilities. Conferences are cancelled. A huge number of lecturers and other staff on temporary contracts were already insecure before the virus hit, and in some cases shockingly poorly paid. Now the prospect of further cuts and outsourcing looms.

The easing of the lockdown, whenever it comes, should lessen the sense of disaster and enable the social side of academic life to resume. But the autumn is expected to bring fresh difficulties, with between 20% and 80% of international students, whose fees the sector relies on (about £3bn in England), expected to stay away. Some fear British students too could opt out on the grounds that physical distancing measures will disrupt learning. In Scotland the threat is even more acute, since without tuition fees universities are even more reliant on international income.

So far the Treasury appears resistant to the sector’s call for a £2bn bailout, although this is supported by other Whitehall departments. Given the scale of the unfolding economic disaster this is perhaps not surprising. But it would be folly for politicians to ignore the proposed rescue package, which includes a cap on numbers designed to protect the weaker institutions and disciplines that are most likely to suffer. The UK was the second most popular destination in the world for international students, behind the US, until recently being overtaken by Australia. Boris Johnson’s reintroduction of the post-study work visas removed by Theresa May sent a strong, positive signal.

The aggressive and ideological marketisation of the English university system has destroyed much that was of value. Soaring pay for managers combined with casualisation of academic staff is a symptom of a deeper malaise. The combination of tuition fees with decades of housing market failure has placed an impossible and unjust burden on the young. There is a risk that Brexit could be harmful to a sector that must be outward-facing, as well as taking seriously its local obligations, if it is to succeed.

But right now, the priority must be to support universities through the crisis, and enable these hubs of science, culture and ideas – which are also major employers – to play their part in the national recovery. Four of Europe’s 30 universities disappeared in the wake of the Black Death. To allow the UK university sector to shrink following Covid-19 would only perpetuate the unimaginative short-termism that has so depleted the public sector over the past decade. As policymakers struggle to contain a disaster they failed to prepare for, it should be obvious how much we need our centres of learning.
News is under threat …



… just when we need it the most. Millions of readers around the world are flocking to the Guardian in search of honest, authoritative, fact-based reporting that can help them understand the biggest challenge we have faced in our lifetime. But at this crucial moment, news organisations are facing an unprecedented existential challenge. As businesses everywhere feel the pinch, the advertising revenue that has long helped sustain our journalism continues to plummet. We need your help to fill the gap.








You’ve read 28 articles in the last six months. We believe every one of us deserves equal access to vital public service journalism. So, unlike many others, we made a different choice: to keep Guardian journalism open for all, regardless of where they live or what they can afford to pay. This would not be possible without financial contributions from those who can afford to pay, who now support our work from 180 countries around the world.








We have upheld our editorial independence in the face of the disintegration of traditional media – with social platforms giving rise to misinformation, the seemingly unstoppable rise of big tech and independent voices being squashed by commercial ownership. The Guardian’s independence means we can set our own agenda and voice our own opinions. Our journalism is free from commercial and political bias – never influenced by billionaire owners or shareholders. This makes us different. It means we can challenge the powerful without fear and give a voice to those less heard.








Reader financial support has meant we can keep investigating, disentangling and interrogating. It has protected our independence, which has never been so critical. We are so grateful.








We need your support so we can keep delivering quality journalism that’s open and independent. And that is here for the long term. Every reader contribution, however big or small, is so valuable. Support the Guardian from as little as $1 – and it only takes a minute. Thank you.